What is the difference between reliable and credible




















Reputable news articles usually link their sources within the paragraphs and the links should take the reader to the main source of information, which itself is also a reliable source. This shows that the article was well researched and gives credit to ideas or findings that were incorporated. Most importantly, it illustrates whether the article is accurate, not plagiarized and is the work of the author. The age of the sources are also important, as new information especially during the election period can be presented quickly.

Thus, reliable sources also must be active and updated frequently. A source that has no citations at all, or those that present non-verifiable links broken, in-active links, or links that lead to unrelated material as evidence should be an immediate red flag. These links should be questioned because it proves that the source was not well-researched or updated and hints that it is based on opinion or made-up information, and not facts.

As the purpose of journalism is to provide the reader with information to help them make the best decisions in their lives, reputable sources will be unbiased and focused on reporting the facts. They will not contain any personal opinions from the author unless it is an opinion article. In unreliable sources, bias and offensive language can be seen because they are usually not written for the purpose of informing.

Writers will often include their contact information so that readers can contact them to ask questions. Having no information about the author is a sign of unreliability because anyone can write articles and post them. The motive of the source provides insight about reliability. If there is a lack of coverage , it could mean that the news is not legitimate. The acceptable answers to these questions will vary depending on your needs.

The questions are:. Like the 5Ws method it also involves answering critical questions about your source. The criteria are:. Skip to primary content. Skip to sidebar content. Toggle navigation.

E-Journals Alphabetical list of electronic journal titles held at UW. Evaluating Information Learn how to choose the best and most reliable information that meets your research needs. Course Reserves Library materials reserved for your classes. Mobile Search Tools Mobile-optimized research databases and library-related mobile apps. Undergraduate Researcher Tutorial Self-paced online tutorial that introduces students to research skills and UW Libraries resources and services.

Your Library Account Log in to renew borrowed materials, check on items you have requested, and pay fines. Accessibility We are committed to providing equal access to library collections, services, and facilities for all library users. FAQ Short, simple how-to and demos of frequently asked questions about using the Libraries and information resources. A credible witness may not be a reliable witness. Any witness whose evidence on an issue is not credible cannot give reliable evidence on the same point.

Credibility, on the other hand, is not a proxy for reliability: a credible witness may give unreliable evidence. Even if a witness appears to be sincere, truthful, and honest, and even if the witness believes what he or she is saying, it does not necessarily follow that his or her evidence is reliable.

Only the user who asked this question will see who disagreed with this answer. Read more comments. Credible means something that is believable, convincing, and usually from a legitamite source.

For example, you could say someone's story is not credible Reliable means something or someone you can rely on, someone you can trust and lean on, someone who is responsible. If you can put your head on this person's shoulder, then he or she is reliable.

But anything can be reliable, not only people.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000