Who is pim fortuyn

Added to that, Pim was not the only politician receiving a cake on the head: Cakes were thrown on minister Ruding, Labour leader Melkert etc. Fortuyn himself was a master in demonising others by accusing them of belittling him. Too bad he was killed. Apart from the obvious tragedy of any murder, this was the first political assassination since the founding of the Dutch Republic. It would have been a delight to have Pim around today.

Not that he would still be in politics today because he could not come up with solid policies outside of his populist frames. Then in , Van der Graaf had the nerve to take legal action against the government over the terms of his parole, saying that the parole hearings prevented him from emigrating. Oh the inhumanity, the injustice to this poor little fellow!

Maybe to the Republic of the Congo would be appropriate for him. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed. We're constantly hunting for the latest, greatest, and most Dutch spots for our readers. Want your business to reach an unrivalled expat and international audience?

All material on this website DutchReview is strictly copyright and all rights reserved. If you are dissatisfied with the website or any content or materials on it, your sole exclusive remedy is to discontinue your use of the website. The website may provide links to other websites on the Internet, the content of which is not in our control.

Whilst every effort has been made to ensure accuracy, the publisher cannot accept responsibility for omissions and errors. If you have found material on this website which is copyrighted by others, please contact the webmaster on this matter in order to have it removed.

When he declared his candidacy in an August television appearance, not many people in the Netherlands knew who he was. But that changed, quickly. Like Trump, Fortuyn had the kind of bravado that TV cameras and headline writers everywhere love. Fortuyn, like Trump, initially didn't have much of a broader ideology. But he did know one thing: Muslim immigration was a threat to Dutch values.

The result was something very much like the Trump phenomenon: a media frenzy that catapulted a charismatic political novice with no organization to the top levels of national politics.

At times during his ascent, Fortuyn even talked like Trump. I don't hate Islam. I consider it a backwards culture. I have travelled much in the world. And wherever Islam rules, it's just terrible. All the hypocrisy. It's a bit like those old Reformed Protestants. The Reformed lie all the time.

These statements, and others, shocked polite Dutch society, which got Fortuyn plenty more media coverage — and built him a massive movement. That's the worst thing you can say in Dutch politics. Trump and Fortuyn, through either surprising insight or trial and error, picked up on an issue that mainstream politicians were ignoring but that much of the electorate cared deeply about.

By bringing it to the fore, they built a wave of political support totally out of proportion to their actual organizational strength. There appears to be a base for this kind of appeal in virtually every Western country. Right-wing populists across Europe, from France's Front National to Austria's Freedom Party, draw from the same core demographic group.

Despite wildly different welfare states and immigration policies in the US and various European countries, the same group of people consistently feel like they're being failed — and are attracted to anti-immigrant demagogues as a result.

No other issue has this kind of power, across borders, to draw people to the revanchist right. Elisabeth Ivarsflaten , a comparative politics professor at the University of Bergen, compared seven different European countries with far-right parties in a paper.

Specifically, she was looking to see what drove people to the populist right: dissatisfaction with the economy, distrust in political institutions, or anti-immigrant sentiment. Profile: Fortuyn killer. Obituary: Pim Fortuyn. The paradox of Pim Fortuyn. Image source, AFP. Pim Fortuyn's blunt language created a big stir in Dutch politics. Kurz vor der Wahl zum Parlament wurde er bei einem Attentat in Hilversum erschossen.

Fortuyn menulai kontroversi akibat pendapatnya mengenai multikulturalisme, imigrasi dan Islam di Belanda. Ia menganggap Islam sebagai "budaya yang terbelakang", dan ia pernah mengatakan bahwa ia akan melarang pendatang Muslim masuk jika hal tersebut dimungkinkan secara hukum.

Ia dicap sebagai tokoh populis kanan jauh oleh musuh-musuhnya dan juga oleh media, tetap ia menolak cap tersebut. Ia berulangkali menegaskan bahwa ia adalah seorang pragmatik dan bukan populis. Namun, ia telah membandingkan dirinya dengan politikus-politikus tengah-kanan seperti Silvio Berlusconi dari Italia. Selain itu, Fortuyn mengkritik dan kebijakan-kebijakan pemerintahan Wim Kok. Salah satu hal yang membuat dirinya menarik perhatian publik adalah latar belakangnya sebagai seorang homoseksual Katolik.

Fortuyn selama oleh. Saat diadili, van der Graaf mengaku bahwa ia membunuh Fortuyn agar ia tidak lagi menjadikan Muslim sebagai "kambing hitam" dan agar ia tidak dapat lagi menyerang "anggota masyarakat yang lemah" untuk mendapat kekuatan politik.